Re: CSVQL? CSV SQL? tab-separated table I/O? RENAME COLUMN
От | Adrian Klaver |
---|---|
Тема | Re: CSVQL? CSV SQL? tab-separated table I/O? RENAME COLUMN |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 9ff6355f-b37c-6632-6ad2-3e113d54a0d6@aklaver.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: CSVQL? CSV SQL? tab-separated table I/O? RENAME COLUMN (George Neuner <gneuner2@comcast.net>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
On 05/03/2018 09:47 AM, George Neuner wrote: > On Wed, 2 May 2018 16:01:01 -0700, Adrian Klaver > <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com> wrote: > >> On 05/02/2018 02:29 PM, Jim Michaels wrote: >> >>> >>> - the microsoft patented CSV would be required for implementation. it >>> handles special data with commas and double-quotes in them >> >> Huh?: >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comma-separated_values#History > > > Disclaimer ... I haven't investigated the claim. Difficult because it is made up of dreams, wishes and nightmares:) > > However, I would not discount the possibility that Microsoft really > has patented some variation of CSV. They absolutely did *try* to > copyright the use of + and - symbols for specifying addition and > subtraction operations in VisualBASIC. Not seeing it: http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-bool.html&r=0&f=S&l=50&TERM1=microsoft&FIELD1=AANM&co1=AND&TERM2=csv&FIELD2=&d=PTXT > > It's possible that they slipped something past the examiners. But > more likely the use of a CSV-like format was specified to be part of a > larger process. In that case the format itself might not be claimed, > but rather only the *use* of the format for some specific purpose. > > IANAL, > George > > > -- Adrian Klaver adrian.klaver@aklaver.com
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: