Re: BUG #18146: Rows reappearing in Tables after Auto-Vacuum Failure in PostgreSQL on Windows
| От | Laurenz Albe |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: BUG #18146: Rows reappearing in Tables after Auto-Vacuum Failure in PostgreSQL on Windows |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 9fc4118d2a8f2290d8598a9c4d451c4c90b17cee.camel@cybertec.at обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | BUG #18146: Rows reappearing in Tables after Auto-Vacuum Failure in PostgreSQL on Windows (PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org>) |
| Ответы |
Re: BUG #18146: Rows reappearing in Tables after Auto-Vacuum Failure in PostgreSQL on Windows
|
| Список | pgsql-bugs |
On Tue, 2023-10-03 at 17:25 +0000, PG Bug reporting form wrote:
> Version: PostgreSQL 10.21, compiled by Visual C++ build 1800, 64-bit
>
> Platform: Windows
>
> In our application code, we've implemented logic to clean up entries in
> several PostgreSQL tables using a loop. Although some of these tables have
> foreign key references, we've included them to ensure a thorough deletion
> process. Here's a simplified code snippet:
>
> String tables[] = {"TableA", "TableB", "TableC", "TableD", "TableE",
> "TableF", "TableG", "TableH"};
>
> for (String tableName : tables) {
> try {
> stmt = conn.prepareStatement("DELETE FROM " + tableName);
> stmt.execute();
> } catch (Exception ex) {
> // Log the exception
> }
> }
> Notably, it leaves entries in different tables each time, and we've found
> auto-vacuum failure traces in the pg_log for these tables at the same time.
> Here's an example of the error messages from pg_log:
>
> 2023-09-28 12:03:35.955 IST,,,11592,,65151e2d.2d48,1,,2023-09-28 12:03:17
> IST,6/19,122786262,ERROR,42501,"could not truncate file
> ""base/16509/6935026"" to 0 blocks: Permission denied",,,,,"automatic vacuum
> of table ""DB.public.TableB""",,,,"" 2023-09-28 12:03:37.205
> IST,,,11592,,65151e2d.2d48,2,,2023-09-28 12:03:17
> IST,6/45,122786326,ERROR,42501,"could not truncate file
> ""base/16509/6935443"" to 0 blocks: Permission denied",,,,,"automatic vacuum
> of table ""DB.public.TableB""",,,,""
>
> We've already attempted to exclude the entire pg folder from antivirus
> scans, but the problem persists. Any insights or solutions to this issue
> would be greatly appreciated. Thank you!
PostgreSQL v10 is out of support.
Data corruption like this is not necessarily caused by a PostgreSQL bug.
Yours,
Laurenz Albe
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: