Re: Postgres limitation in user management
От | Ron |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Postgres limitation in user management |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 9faf2c18-5029-4d77-a937-ece6d25f9678@gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Postgres limitation in user management ("Peter J. Holzer" <hjp-pgsql@hjp.at>) |
Ответы |
Re: Postgres limitation in user management
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On 11/4/23 16:53, Peter J. Holzer wrote: > On 2023-11-04 21:42:34 +0000, Brent Wood wrote: >>>> We have 2 sets of database user groups – >>>> >>>> 1. App – who owns the application schemas (and tables) >>>> 2. Support – who provides db support >>>> >>>> We want Support users to have no SELECT or DML privilege but only ALTER >> TABLE >>>> to perform any troubleshooting in the database. >>> This seems strange to me. What kind of troubleshooting requires to >>> ability to ALTER TABLE but not to do DML? >> Where your db admin & data admin are separated. Data security issues can >> require minimal access to data, which a dba does not necessarily require. >> Especially when the DBA role is contracted out. >> >> Sort of along this line, we have offloaded user management to AD, so our DB >> user management is now carried out via in-house IT, who are not DBA's and have >> no access to data. > This doesn't answer the question why ALTER TABLE privilege would be > required. I bet the Good Idea Fairy whispered something into the CISO's ear. -- Born in Arizona, moved to Babylonia.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: