Re: how many record versions
От | Manfred Koizar |
---|---|
Тема | Re: how many record versions |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 9ep1b09r9c21dbjcf3au5747h67i7gnahk@email.aon.at обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: how many record versions (David Garamond <lists@zara.6.isreserved.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: how many record versions
Re: how many record versions unsubscribe |
Список | pgsql-general |
On Sun, 23 May 2004 23:32:48 +0700, David Garamond <lists@zara.6.isreserved.com> wrote: >Actually, each record will be incremented probably only thousands of >times a day. But there are many banners. Each record has a (bannerid, >campaignid, websiteid, date, countrycode) "dimensions" and (impression, >click) "measures". If you need all of bannerid, campaignid, websiteid, date, countrycode to identify a row, it may be worth the effort to split this up into two tables: CREATE TABLE dimensions ( dimensionid int PRIMARY KEY, bannerid ..., campaignid ..., websiteid ..., date ..., countrycode ..., UNIQUE (bannerid, ..., countrycode) ); CREATE TABLE measures ( dimensionid int PRIMARY KEY REFERENCES dimensions, impression ..., click ... ); Thus you'd only update measures thousands of times and the index would be much more compact, because the PK is only a four byte integer. > The table currently has +- 1,5-2 mil records (it's in >MyISAM MySQL), so I'm not sure if I can use that many sequences which >Tom suggested. Every impression (banner view) and click will result in a >SQL statement Schedule a VACUUM ANALYSE measures; for every 100000 updates or so. >I'm contemplating of moving to Postgres, but am worried with the MVCC >thing. I've previously tried briefly using InnoDB in MySQL but have to >revert back to MyISAM because the load increased significantly. You mean InnoDB cannot handle the load? Servus Manfred
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: