Re: OID wrap around
От | Steve O'Hagan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: OID wrap around |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 9ekb6o$1bk9$1@news.tht.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | RE: OID wrap around (<jeff.fitzmyers@managestar.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Re: OID wrap around
|
Список | pgsql-general |
But when I've finished calculating the 4 billion names of God, it wont matter anyway - end of universe as we know it . . . ;-) Regards. SGO. <jeff.fitzmyers@managestar.com> wrote in message news:371EAC487A83CD4296F6999FD088D83305B725@atlas.managestar.com... > Remembering past discussions: Yes OID's wrap around. When this happens, > they will not nesecarily be unique anymore. Apparently this should not > be a problem unless one has queries that specifically use OID's. INT8 > OID's have been talked about and will probably be implemented some day. > > Jeff > >>>>> > Someone mentioned the OIDs are unique for every row for an entire > database cluster. I also notice that they are not being reused (like a > sequence). Will they wrap around as soon as the 2^32 boundary is hit? > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo@postgresql.org
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: