On Tue, 2025-09-30 at 13:53 +0530, Ashish Mukherjee wrote:
> Now the consideration is to use some other encryption option for the
> database which will work fine on pgsql 17. Cybertec's technology is
> one route, the other is EDB. I am happy to hear experiences of folks
> here with pgsql encryption options for v17 on large databases
> (2.5T in our case).
I will refrain from making a recommendation, but you should know that
data-at-rest encryption will always incur a certain performance penalty.
Whatever solution you choose, you should run performance tests.
Yours,
Laurenz Albe