Re: Non-superuser subscription owners
От | Jeff Davis |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Non-superuser subscription owners |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 9da4d877048f767d36283fca1a3d133112fceca7.camel@j-davis.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Non-superuser subscription owners (Mark Dilger <mark.dilger@enterprisedb.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Non-superuser subscription owners
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 2021-12-15 at 12:23 -0800, Mark Dilger wrote: > > On Nov 24, 2021, at 4:30 PM, Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com> wrote: > > > > We need to do permission checking for WITH CHECK OPTION and RLS. > > The > > patch right now allows the subscription to write data that an RLS > > policy forbids. > > Version 4 of the patch, attached, no longer allows RLS to be > circumvented, but does so in a course-grained fashion. Committed. I tried to do some performance testing to see if there was any impact of the extra catalog + ACL checks. Logical replication seems slow enough -- something like 3X slower than local inserts -- that it didn't seem to make a difference. To test it, I did the following: 1. sent a SIGSTOP to the logical apply worker 2. loaded more data in publisher 3. made the subscriber a sync replica 4. timed the following: a. sent a SIGCONT to the logical apply worker b. insert a single tuple on the publisher side c. wait for the insert to return, indicating that logical replication is done up to that point Does anyone have a better way to measure logical replication performance? Regards, Jeff Davis
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: