Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] few fts functions for jsonb
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] few fts functions for jsonb |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 9c97e73b-fa84-0711-b408-3a6e2d89ea96@2ndQuadrant.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] few fts functions for jsonb (Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [PATCH] few fts functions for jsonb
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 03/21/2017 06:28 PM, Dmitry Dolgov wrote: > > On 21 March 2017 at 03:03, Andrew Dunstan > <andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com > <mailto:andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com>> wrote: > > > > However, I think it should probably be broken up into a couple of > pieces - > > one for the generic json/jsonb transforms infrastructure (which probably > > needs some more comments) and one for the FTS functions that will > use it. > > Sure, here are two patches with separated functionality and a bit more > commentaries for the transform functions. I'm not through looking at this. However, here are a few preliminary comments * we might need to rationalize the header locations a bit * iterate_json(b) and transform_json(b) are a bit too generallynamed. Really what they do is iterate over or transform string values in the json(b). They ignore / preservethe structure, keys, and non-string scalar values in the json(b). A general iterate or transform function wouldbe called in effect with a stream of all the elements in the json, not just scalar strings. * Unless I'm missing somethingthe iterate_json(b)_values return value is ignored. Instead of returning the state it looks to me like it shouldreturn nothing and be declared as void instead of void * * transform_jsonb and transform_json are somewhat asymmetrical.The latter should probably return a text* instead of a StringInfo, to be consistent with the former. cheers andrew -- Andrew Dunstan https://www.2ndQuadrant.com PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: