Re: Introduce "log_connection_stages" setting.

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Jacob Champion
Тема Re: Introduce "log_connection_stages" setting.
Дата
Msg-id 9b944c52-85d9-bc1d-99f1-35d9eaef1bfb@timescale.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Introduce "log_connection_stages" setting.  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: Introduce "log_connection_stages" setting.  (Sergey Dudoladov <sergey.dudoladov@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 3/2/23 14:56, Tom Lane wrote:
> Jacob Champion <jchampion@timescale.com> writes:
>> If I've understood Tom correctly in [1], both of these guc_mallocs
>> should be using a loglevel less than ERROR, to avoid forcing a
>> postmaster exit when out of memory. (I used WARNING in that thread
>> instead, which seemed to be acceptable.)
> 
> Actually, preferred practice is as seen in e.g. check_datestyle:
> 
>     myextra = (int *) guc_malloc(LOG, 2 * sizeof(int));
>     if (!myextra)
>         return false;
>     myextra[0] = newDateStyle;
>     myextra[1] = newDateOrder;
>     *extra = (void *) myextra;
> 
> which gives the guc.c functions an opportunity to manage the
> failure.

Ah, thanks for the correction. (My guc_strdup(WARNING, ...) calls may
need to be cleaned up too, then.)

--Jacob



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Memory leak from ExecutorState context?
Следующее
От: Tomas Vondra
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Memory leak from ExecutorState context?