Re: Global snapshots
От | Andrey Lepikhov |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Global snapshots |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 9b36d84a-daac-be1a-df38-67a3317fc209@postgrespro.ru обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | RE: Global snapshots ("tsunakawa.takay@fujitsu.com" <tsunakawa.takay@fujitsu.com>) |
Ответы |
RE: Global snapshots
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
22.09.2020 03:47, tsunakawa.takay@fujitsu.com пишет: > Does this make sense from your viewpoint, and can we think that we can use Clock-SI without infrindging on the patent? According to the patent holder, the difference between Clock-SI and the patent seems to be fewer than the similarities. Thank you for this work! As I can see, main development difficulties placed in other areas: CSN, resolver, global deadlocks, 2PC commit... I'm not lawyer too. But if we get remarks from the patent holders, we can rewrite our Clock-SI implementation. -- regards, Andrey Lepikhov Postgres Professional
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: