Re: PXGS vs TAP tests
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PXGS vs TAP tests |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 9b21ac1e-c8fd-26bc-32e0-70782076db73@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PXGS vs TAP tests (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: PXGS vs TAP tests
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 6/20/21 10:45 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes: >> The recipe for running TAP tests in src/Makefile.global doesn't work for >> the PGXS case. If you try it you get something like this: >> ... >> Notice those bogus settings for top_builddir, PG_REGRESS and >> REGRESS_SHLIB. The attached patch fixes this bug. > OK, but does the 'prove_check' macro need similar adjustments? No, PGXS doesn't support 'make check'. In the case of TAP tests it really doesn't matter - you're not going to be running against a started server anyway. > >> I removed the REGRESS_SHLIB setting altogether for the PGXS case - it's >> not clear to me why we need it in a TAP test recipe at all. > After some digging in the git history, it looks like it's there because > of Noah's c09850992, which makes me wonder whether 017_shm.pl requires > it. If so, it'd make more sense perhaps for that one test script > to set up the environment variable than to have it cluttering every TAP > run. Yeah, I'll do some testing. > > (In any case, please don't push this till after beta2 is tagged. > We don't need possible test instability right now.) > > Yes, of course. cheers andre -- Andrew Dunstan EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: