Re: boolean in C
От | Grzegorz Jaskiewicz |
---|---|
Тема | Re: boolean in C |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 9F52F8DE-B1F8-4B7E-B4E7-BDCE6A00D36B@pointblue.com.pl обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: boolean in C (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: boolean in C
Re: boolean in C |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 16 Jul 2009, at 14:20, Tom Lane wrote: > Grzegorz Jaskiewicz <gj@pointblue.com.pl> writes: >> oh, another thing. >> stdbool is C99 standard feature. > > We are still targeting C89, not C99. > > Another reason not to depend on stdbool is that, so far as I can see, > the standard does not promise that type _Bool has size = 1 byte. > We have to have that because of on-disk compatibility requirements. I think the latter is easily fixable, or forceable to be one byte. Why C89, and not C99 ? Virtually all compilers for last 4 years have/ had C99 support.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: