Re: Duplicate key existant/index visibility bug in 9.3.3
От | Erik Jones |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Duplicate key existant/index visibility bug in 9.3.3 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 9ED28E1E-9F4D-4794-A1DD-0D49D085A6E6@engineyard.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Duplicate key existant/index visibility bug in 9.3.3 (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Duplicate key existant/index visibility bug in 9.3.3
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
On Jan 26, 2015, at 2:43 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >=20 > Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com> writes: >> On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 2:19 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >>> You should definitely also update to 9.3.5 (or next week, 9.3.6) = ASAP. >>> Even if this specific problem isn't fixed, there's a bunch of things >>> that *are* fixed and will eventually bite you. 9.3.X has not been >>> one of our most stable release branches :-( >=20 >> I didn't consider the bug report in detail, but I think it's likely >> that this was in fact the bug fixed by >> 6bfa88acd3df830a5f7e8677c13512b1b50ae813. >=20 > Maybe. That would require at least one crash recovery to have = happened on > the server, which Erik seemed to be claiming had not happened. But > if there were any crashes then it would possibly fit. Definitely nothing recent crash/recovery-wise but digging further back = in the logs it looks like there was a crash recovery run startup back on = 2014-09-30, which was about a week after this server was created. I = suppose it=E2=80=99s possible that the index has been corrupt since then = but only now showing something visible?=
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: