Re: suboverflowed subtransactions concurrency performance optimize
От | Andrey Borodin |
---|---|
Тема | Re: suboverflowed subtransactions concurrency performance optimize |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 9DFFDA6C-BCA8-4C52-8D4E-4B8C9576753D@yandex-team.ru обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | RE: suboverflowed subtransactions concurrency performance optimize ("Pengchengliu" <pengchengliu@tju.edu.cn>) |
Ответы |
RE: suboverflowed subtransactions concurrency performance optimize
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Sorry, for some reason Mail.app converted message to html and mailing list mangled this html into mess. I'm resending previousmessage as plain text again. Sorry for the noise. > 31 авг. 2021 г., в 11:43, Pengchengliu <pengchengliu@tju.edu.cn> написал(а): > > Hi Andrey, > Thanks a lot for your replay and reference information. > > The default NUM_SUBTRANS_BUFFERS is 32. My implementation is local_cache_subtrans_pages can be adjusted dynamically. > If we configure local_cache_subtrans_pages as 64, every backend use only extra 64*8192=512KB memory. > So the local cache is similar to the first level cache. And subtrans SLRU is the second level cache. > And I think extra memory is very well worth it. It really resolve massive subtrans stuck issue which I mentioned in previousemail. > > I have view the patch of [0] before. For SLRU buffers adding GUC configuration parameters are very nice. > I think for subtrans, its optimize is not enough. For SubTransGetTopmostTransaction, we should get the SubtransSLRULockfirst, then call SubTransGetParent in loop. > Prevent acquire/release SubtransSLRULock in SubTransGetTopmostTransaction-> SubTransGetParent in loop. > After I apply this patch which I optimize SubTransGetTopmostTransaction, with my test case, I still get stuck result. SubTransGetParent() acquires only Shared lock on SubtransSLRULock. The problem may arise only when someone reads page fromdisk. But if you have big enough cache - this will never happen. And this cache will be much less than 512KB*max_connections. I think if we really want to fix exclusive SubtransSLRULock I think best option would be to split SLRU control lock intoarray of locks - one for each bank (in v17-0002-Divide-SLRU-buffers-into-n-associative-banks.patch). With this approachwe will have to rename s/bank/partition/g for consistency with locks and buffers partitions. I really liked havingmy own banks, but consistency worth it anyway. Thanks! Best regards, Andrey Borodin.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: