Re: EXPLAIN BUFFERS
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: EXPLAIN BUFFERS |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 9D458AE9-9C62-4682-9B57-DA6F3D5DF83C@gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: EXPLAIN BUFFERS (Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Dec 8, 2009, at 12:05 AM, Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > Robert Haas wrote: >> I could live with the equals signs, but the use of parentheses seems >> weird and inconsistent with normal english usage (which permits >> parentheses as a means of making parenthetical comments). > But it is consistent with people seeing: > > Seq Scan on foo (cost=0.00..155.00 rows=10000 width=4) > > Which seems to be what was being emulated here. I though that was > pretty reasonable given this is a related feature. It's not the same at all. The essence of a parenthetical phrase is that it can be omitted without turning what's left into nonsense - and in fact we have COSTS OFF, which does just that. Omitting only the parenthesized portions of the proposed output would not be sensible. ...Robert
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: