Re: [BUGS] BUG #14825: enum type: unsafe use?
От | Christophe Pettus |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [BUGS] BUG #14825: enum type: unsafe use? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 9C898B52-A75C-4CA1-84DD-8B89051DFEB2@pgexperts.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [BUGS] BUG #14825: enum type: unsafe use? (Andrew Dunstan <andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Список | pgsql-bugs |
> On Sep 25, 2017, at 07:55, Andrew Dunstan <andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > Let's ask a couple of users who I think are or have been actually > hurting on this point. Christophe and David, any opinions? Since about 90% of what I encounter in this area are automatically-generated migrations, having a clear set of (perhaps restrictive)rules which never fail is the most important. It's easy to split the CREATE or ALTERs out into their own transaction,and leave usage (such as populating a table from a migration) to a second transaction. It's not clear to me that this is a vote either way, but I think the easiest thing to explain ("you cannot use a new enumvalue in the same transaction that created it") is the best in this situation. -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: