Re: jsonpath: Missing regex_like && starts with Errors?
От | David E. Wheeler |
---|---|
Тема | Re: jsonpath: Missing regex_like && starts with Errors? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 9BAFB50F-267E-4078-9558-36155E93A723@justatheory.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: jsonpath: Missing regex_like && starts with Errors? ("David E. Wheeler" <david@justatheory.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: jsonpath: Missing regex_like && starts with Errors?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Jun 16, 2024, at 11:52, David E. Wheeler <david@justatheory.com> wrote: > I think that’s how it should be; I prefer that it raises errors by default but you can silence them: > > david=# select jsonb_path_query(target => '{"x": "hi"}', path => '$.integer()', silent => false); > ERROR: jsonpath item method .integer() can only be applied to a string or numeric value > > david=# select jsonb_path_query(target => '{"x": "hi"}', path => '$.integer()', silent => true); > jsonb_path_query > ------------------ > (0 rows) > > I suggest that the same behavior be adopted for `like_regex` and `starts with`. Okay, I think I’ve figured this out, and the key is that I am, once again, comparing predicate path queries to SQL standardqueries. If I update the first example to use a comparison I no longer get an error: david=# select jsonb_path_query('{"x": "hi"}', '$.integer() == 1'); jsonb_path_query ------------------ null So I think that’s the key: There’s not a difference between the behavior of `like_regex` and `starts with` vs other predicateexpressions. This dichotomy continues to annoy. I would very much like some way to have jsonb_path_query() raise an error (or even a warning!)if passed a predate expression, and for jsonb_path_match() to raise an error or warning if its path is not a predicateexpression. Because I keep confusing TF out of myself. Best, David
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: