Re: [v9.5] Custom Plan API

> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> > I haven't followed this at all, but I just skimmed over it and noticed
> > the CustomPlanMarkPos thingy; apologies if this has been discussed
> > before.  It seems a bit odd to me; why isn't it sufficient to have a
> > boolean flag in regular CustomPlan to indicate that it supports
> > mark/restore?
>
> Yeah, I thought that was pretty bogus too, but it's well down the list of
> issues that were there last time I looked at this ...
>
IIRC, CustomPlanMarkPos was suggested to keep the interface of
ExecSupportsMarkRestore() that takes plannode tag to determine
whether it support Mark/Restore.
As my original proposition did, it seems to me a flag field in
CustomPlan structure is straightforward, if we don't hesitate to
change ExecSupportsMarkRestore().

Thanks,
--
NEC OSS Promotion Center / PG-Strom Project
KaiGai Kohei <kaigai@ak.jp.nec.com>