Re: One question about security label command

> * Tom Lane (tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote:
> > The idea of making the regression test entirely independent of the
> > system's policy would presumably solve this problem, so I'd kind of
> > like to see progress on that front.
> 
> Apologies, I guess it wasn't clear, but that's what I was intending to
> advocate.
>
OK, I'll try to design a new regression test policy that is independent
from the system's policy assumption, like unconfined domain.

Please give me time for this work.

Thanks,
--
NEC OSS Promotion Center / PG-Strom Project
KaiGai Kohei <kaigai@ak.jp.nec.com>


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stephen Frost [mailto:sfrost@snowman.net]
> Sent: Monday, March 16, 2015 7:16 AM
> To: Tom Lane
> Cc: Alvaro Herrera; Kohei KaiGai; Robert Haas; Kaigai Kouhei(海外 浩平); 张元
> 超; pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] One question about security label command
> 
> Tom,
> 
> * Tom Lane (tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote:
> > The idea of making the regression test entirely independent of the
> > system's policy would presumably solve this problem, so I'd kind of
> > like to see progress on that front.
> 
> Apologies, I guess it wasn't clear, but that's what I was intending to
> advocate.
> 
>     Thanks,
> 
>         Stephen