Re: A GROUP BY question
От | Alban Hertroys |
---|---|
Тема | Re: A GROUP BY question |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 9A246E87-E81A-46FB-A69D-021698A9B731@gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: A GROUP BY question ("David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
> On 13 Aug 2019, at 15:19, David G. Johnston <david.g.johnston@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Tuesday, August 13, 2019, Alban Hertroys <haramrae@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On 13 Aug 2019, at 13:10, stan <stanb@panix.com> wrote: > > > > select > > project.proj_no , > > Removed columns that get in the way of your desired result. You can’t have both details and the sum over them in a meaningfulway. > > Sure you can, at least generally, with Window Functions/Expressions (i.e., OVER) That’s why I added “in a meaningful way” ;) Repeating the same SUM-result on every line in a group is not what I’d call a meaningful result; the SUM has no bearing onthe detailed line and leads to the kind of mistakes I already mentioned. (For the record; I do this kind of grouping in a hierarchical database regularly, but there the grouped SUM is at a differentlevel in the hierarchy and I consider it thus sufficiently separated from the detail rows.) Besides, I figured the OP was already struggling with the query syntax, adding window functions into the mix didn’t seema good idea in the context. Possible?, sure, desirable?, I would say not. Alban Hertroys -- There is always an exception to always.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: