Re: Script binaries renaming
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Script binaries renaming |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 9998.1206496799@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Script binaries renaming (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Script binaries renaming
Re: Script binaries renaming |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes: > Where are we on this? Tom thinks we don't want this. TODO has: > * Prefix command-line utilities like createuser with 'pg_' > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2007-06/msg00025.php It wasn't just me; quite a few people were dubious about it when the patch was submitted. See the thread here: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2007-07/msg00055.php > One idea is to keep the existing commands and just add pg_* (or pg*) to > additional versions, with the idea that the original versions will be > removed some day. AFAICS the only argument for doing this is to eliminate confusion and potential conflicts, which means that we get no benefit at all until we actually do remove the old names. So if we're going to do this, we have to make a commitment that we're going to remove the old names within the reasonably foreseeable future (say, about two releases out). Are we really prepared to break everyone's scripts for this? regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: