Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Rename pg_switch_xlog to pg_switch_wal
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Rename pg_switch_xlog to pg_switch_wal |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 9987.1484244755@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Rename pg_switch_xlog to pg_switch_wal (Vladimir Rusinov <vrusinov@google.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Rename pg_switch_xlog to pg_switch_wal
Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Rename pg_switch_xlog to pg_switch_wal Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Rename pg_switch_xlog to pg_switch_wal |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Vladimir Rusinov <vrusinov@google.com> writes: > On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 4:57 PM, Euler Taveira <euler@timbira.com.br> wrote: >> As Robert suggested in the other email: extension to create old names. > I don't follow the reasoning for the extension. It seem to have downsides > of both alternatives combined: we still break people's code, and we add > even more maintenance burden than just keeping aliases. Yeah, I'm not terribly for the extension idea. Robert cited the precedent of contrib/tsearch2, but I think the history of that is a good argument against this: tsearch2 is still there 9 years later and there's no indication that we'll ever get rid of it. We can let things rot indefinitely in core too. If we do ever agree to get rid of the aliases, stripping them out of pg_proc.h will not be any harder than removing a contrib directory would be. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: