Re: fsync-pgdata-on-recovery tries to write to more files than previously
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: fsync-pgdata-on-recovery tries to write to more files than previously |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 9975.1432919658@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: fsync-pgdata-on-recovery tries to write to more files than previously (Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams@2ndQuadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: fsync-pgdata-on-recovery tries to write to more files
than previously
Re: fsync-pgdata-on-recovery tries to write to more files than previously |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams@2ndQuadrant.com> writes: > At 2015-05-28 17:37:16 -0400, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote: >> I have to leave shortly, so I'll look at the initdb cleanup tomorrow. > Here's a revision of that patch that's more along the lines of what you > committed. Pushed with minor revisions. > It occurred to me that we should probably also silently skip EACCES on > opendir and stat/lstat in walkdir. That's what the attached initdb patch > does. If you think it's a good idea, there's also a small fixup attached > for the backend version too. As I mentioned yesterday, I'm not really on board with ignoring EACCES, except for the directories-on-Windows case. Since we're only logging the failures anyway, I think it is reasonable to log a complaint for any unwritable file in the data directory. I've not done it yet, but what I think we oughta do is revert if (errno == EACCES || (isdir && errno == EISDIR)) back to the former logic if (isdir && (errno == EISDIR || errno == EACCES)) and even then, maybe the EACCES exclusion ought to be Windows only? Also I want to get rid of the ETXTBSY special cases. That one doesn't seem like something that we should silently ignore: what the heck are executables doing in the data directory? Or is there some other meaning on Windows? regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: