Re: [HACKERS] pgbench regression test failure
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] pgbench regression test failure |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 9953.1505244515@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] pgbench regression test failure (Fabien COELHO <coelho@cri.ensmp.fr>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] pgbench regression test failure
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Fabien COELHO <coelho@cri.ensmp.fr> writes: >> I have a serious, serious dislike for tests that seem to work until >> they're run on a heavily loaded machine. > I'm not that sure the error message was because of that. No, this particular failure (probably) wasn't. But now that I've realized that this test case is timing-sensitive, I'm worried about what will happen when it's run on a sufficiently slow or loaded machine. >> I would not necessarily object to doing something in the code that >> would guarantee that, though. > Hmmm. Interesting point. It could be as simple as putting the check-for-done at the bottom of the loop not the top, perhaps. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: