Re: Database Integrity
От | Daniel Staal |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Database Integrity |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 9934586dc368d546f523f9ea71bbfa11.squirrel@www.magehandbook.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Database Integrity (Ramy Abdel-Azim <ramy.abdel-azim@startdatelabs.com>) |
Список | pgsql-novice |
On Fri, November 18, 2011 2:34 pm, Ramy Abdel-Azim wrote: > The purpose of using a transaction is so that if you run your delete > statement and realize that you've deleted the wrong rows, you can roll > the transaction back and get those rows back. You can then modify your > query and try again and when you finally get it right, issue a commit > command. In other words: What do you mean by 'database integrity'? If all you are asking is if the database will still return queries, you don't need the transaction. If you need those queries to return some consistent logical state that the delete would have affected, you probably do need the transaction. If your application can run correctly with 'half' of the delete run, you don't need to be sure the whole delete ran. If it can't, here's a tool to make sure either the whole delete ran or none of it did. The choice for which you need is up to you, and depends on what you are doing. ;) Daniel T. Staal --------------------------------------------------------------- This email copyright the author. Unless otherwise noted, you are expressly allowed to retransmit, quote, or otherwise use the contents for non-commercial purposes. This copyright will expire 5 years after the author's death, or in 30 years, whichever is longer, unless such a period is in excess of local copyright law. ---------------------------------------------------------------
В списке pgsql-novice по дате отправления: