Re: [GENERAL] Future of PostgreSQL
От | Lamar Owen |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [GENERAL] Future of PostgreSQL |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 99122622434800.00550@lorc.wgcr.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [GENERAL] Future of PostgreSQL ("Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
On Sun, 26 Dec 1999, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > On Sat, 25 Dec 1999, Clark C. Evans wrote: > > Plug-in Oracle 7 compatibility. > > I know we have (and have for awhile) a good deal of Oracle > compatibility...what do you mean by 'Plug-In Oracle 7 compatibility'? Plug in Oracle compatibility would mean being able to drop a PostgreSQL server as a replacement to an Oracle server and not having to reconfigure any clients, rewrite any SQL, and basically not even know that the database server has been changed. I personally don't think that 100% drop-in Oracle Compatibility is a good goal -- see Philip Greenspun's Oracle Tips page at http://photo.net/wtr/oracle-tips.html. He also has some real good points about LONG types and oracle CLOBs -- tips that are very worth reading, IMO. I want my long texts to be transparent to my tcl code -- I want to index them for speed, and I want full functionality -- I don't want CLOBS (a takeoff on Postgres/Illustra large objects, IIANM). .... -- Lamar Owen WGCR Internet Radio 1 Peter 4:11
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: