Re: Prefered Types
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Prefered Types |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 9904.1304516978@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Prefered Types (Jim Nasby <jim@nasby.net>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Jim Nasby <jim@nasby.net> writes: > Which begs the question... why do we allow on assignment casting of a float to an int? Because the SQL standard requires it. In any case, the user's intent in such a case is perfectly clear. The reasons for not allowing assignment casts to happen in expression contexts are (1) it would often provide us with too many ways to resolve an operator or function call, leading to "ambiguous operator" failures; (2) it would be surprising for the parser to silently choose a cast that causes information loss. Neither of these arguments applies to "assign this value to an integer column". It's true that if you have exactly one function named f, and it takes an int, then f(float) could be considered clear and unambiguous. But designing this behavior around only the easy cases is not going to work. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: