Re: Teach pg_receivewal to use lz4 compression
От | gkokolatos@pm.me |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Teach pg_receivewal to use lz4 compression |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 98dDHVqTFjZbSkNWXboFJwkOhbR0l6v72vtj31Zels9d5P9wmLxTKqdaipQjkRFEhafwNU3Ds_V0NC8hrpu_JqEJ3JHVIzTIRKNv_IjmVJ4=@pm.me обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Teach pg_receivewal to use lz4 compression (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>) |
Ответы |
Re: Teach pg_receivewal to use lz4 compression
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ On Wednesday, November 3rd, 2021 at 12:23 AM, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 02, 2021 at 12:31:47PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote: >> On Tue, Nov 2, 2021 at 8:17 AM Magnus Hagander magnus@hagander.net wrote: >>> I think for the end user, it is strictly better to name it "gzip", >>> and given that the target of this option is the end user we should >>> do so. (It'd be different it we were talking about a build-time >>> parameter to configure). >> >> I agree. Also, I think there's actually a file format called "zlib" >> which is slightly different from the "gzip" format, and you have to be >> careful not to generate the wrong one. > > Okay, fine by me. It would be better to be also consistent in > WalCompressionMethods once we switch to this option value, then. I will revert to gzip for version 9. Should be out shortly. Cheers, //Georgios > > Michael
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: