Re: Stronger safeguard for archive recovery not to miss data
От | Fujii Masao |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Stronger safeguard for archive recovery not to miss data |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 988f2f72-d5a8-3ff0-3b12-265f10a9e205@oss.nttdata.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Stronger safeguard for archive recovery not to miss data (David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Stronger safeguard for archive recovery not to miss data
Re: Stronger safeguard for archive recovery not to miss data |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2021/04/06 20:44, David Steele wrote: > On 4/6/21 7:13 AM, Fujii Masao wrote: >> >> On 2021/04/06 15:59, osumi.takamichi@fujitsu.com wrote: >>> I just wanted to write why the error was introduced, >>> but it was not necessary. >>> We should remove and fix the first part of the sentence. >> >> So the consensus is almost the same as the latest patch? >> If they are not so different, I'm thinking to push the latest version atfirst. >> Then we can improve the docs if required. > > +1 Thanks! So I pushed the patch. On 2021/04/06 20:48, osumi.takamichi@fujitsu.com wrote: > Yes, please. What I suggested is almost same as your idea. Thanks! Regards, -- Fujii Masao Advanced Computing Technology Center Research and Development Headquarters NTT DATA CORPORATION
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: