Re: Re: [INTERFACES] Trouble with JDBC2 ResultSet.getDate()
От | Peter T Mount |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Re: [INTERFACES] Trouble with JDBC2 ResultSet.getDate() |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 985165919.3ab8705f5ccb9@webmail.retep.org.uk обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [INTERFACES] Trouble with JDBC2 ResultSet.getDate() (Barry Lind <barry@xythos.com>) |
Список | pgsql-jdbc |
Quoting Barry Lind <barry@xythos.com>: > Actually it was the changes in version 1.21 on 2/13 that broke this. > The cvs log for that change includes the following comment: > - Removed need for SimpleDateFormat in ResultSet.getDate() improving > performance. > > My guess is the the code as written would work correctly for a 'date' > column, but doesn't work for a 'timestamp' column. Is there a reason > you are not using getTimestamp() to get the value of the timestamp > column? One of the first things I'm doing once 7.1 is out is add some sanity checking so that the get/set methods on Date, Timestamp, integer, double etc so that getDate() on a Timestamp would work, but also getTimestamp() on a Date column. However, this isn't going to be that easy, and (when I thought of this) 7.1 was already in beta - and this being new functionality couldn't be put in ;-) Peter -- Peter Mount peter@retep.org.uk PostgreSQL JDBC Driver: http://www.retep.org.uk/postgres/ RetepPDF PDF library for Java: http://www.retep.org.uk/pdf/
В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления: