Re: Order of pg_stat_activity timestamp columns
От | Magnus Hagander |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Order of pg_stat_activity timestamp columns |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 9837222c1003171351s2c3199aer2e7e3a9a9196f76d@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Order of pg_stat_activity timestamp columns (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Order of pg_stat_activity timestamp columns
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 21:42, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote: > Has anyone ever noticed that the order of pg_stat_activity timestamp > columns is illogical: > > xact_start | timestamp with time zone | > query_start | timestamp with time zone | > backend_start | timestamp with time zone | Well, 7.4 had only "query start". 8.1 added backend. 8.3 added transaction. So I guess my original guess that things were just added on the end was wrong :-) > query_start is always between the other two timestamps. Moving > query_start before xact_start would make the most sense. I wouldn't > bring this up except we just added application_name before these > columns, so we are already going to have different column locations for > these fields in 9.0. > > Should we move query_start? Or perhaps we should consider moving application_name to the end so it *doesn't* break them? -- Magnus HaganderMe: http://www.hagander.net/Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: