Re: Safe security
От | Magnus Hagander |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Safe security |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 9837222c1003080955y4f23508ewd7b1341a25a18c4f@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Safe security ("David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
2010/3/8 David E. Wheeler <david@kineticode.com>: >> Particularly if the vendor chooses to back-patch >> Safe security fixes without bumping the visible version number, as is >> not unlikely for Red Hat in particular. > > This is why I hate packaging systems. Frankly, Red Hat's Perl has been consistently broken for close to a decade, mainlybecause of patching practices such as this. Goes both way - it's the main reason I hate CPAN, and I know many sysadmins who hold just that position. (to be clear: the lack of back-branch management on CPAN is what sucks) But we're not arguing that. We know it's a situation out there, and we jus thave to deal with it. -- Magnus HaganderMe: http://www.hagander.net/Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: