Re: Recent vendor SSL renegotiation patches break PostgreSQL

2010/2/23 Albe Laurenz <laurenz.albe@wien.gv.at>:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>>>>> One way to deal with it would be to expose the whole renegotiation
>>>>> setting as a user configuratble option. So they can set *when* we
>>>>> renegotiate, which would also let them turn it off completely.
>>>>
>>>> Well, that might be a reasonable thing to do, because it's not just a
>>>> temporary kluge (that we won't know when to remove) but is adding an
>>>> arguably-useful-in-other-ways knob.
>>
>>> You'd still have to turn it off on the server side if you have a
>>> *single* client that has the broken patch, but that's still a lot
>>> better than nothing.
>>
>> Well, if it's a GUC it can be set per-user or per-database, so there's
>> at least some hope of not having to turn it off for everyone.
>>
>> > Think it's worth taking a stab at?
>>
>> If you want to do it, I'd be fine with it.
>
> +1
>
> That would help me with a different problem:
> SSL renegotiation is broken with Npgsql, the cause is Bug 321325
> in the Mono security library
> https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=321325
> which does not look like it is ever going to be fixed.

*ouch*


> Up to now I have crippled SSL renegotiation in our servers with a patch,
> because I figured that bad SSL is better than no SSL.

Given the major security hole in the whole project, SSL without
renegotiation was a *lot* more secure than SSL *with* renegotiation,
until very recently :-) But patching the server is always annoying...

-- Magnus HaganderMe: http://www.hagander.net/Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/