Re: pgsql: Define INADDR_NONE on Solaris when it's missing.
От | Magnus Hagander |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pgsql: Define INADDR_NONE on Solaris when it's missing. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 9837222c1001280809i23b76451r8877d2bf7c71d76c@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pgsql: Define INADDR_NONE on Solaris when it's missing. (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: pgsql: Define INADDR_NONE on Solaris when it's missing.
|
Список | pgsql-committers |
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 17:04, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes: >> On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 16:46, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >>> Possibly more to the point, where are we using INADDR_NONE anyway? > >> In the RADIUS code. > > Oh, that's why it isn't in my tree and has zero portability track record ... > > I think what this shows is we should look for a way to avoid using > INADDR_NONE. What's your grounds for believing it's portable at all? > In the Single Unix Spec I only see INADDR_ANY and INADDR_BROADCAST > defined. Um, I don't think I have any specific grounds for it, other than having seen it in a lot of other software :-) From some more googling (http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/000095399/functions/inet_addr.html), it says it will return (in_addr_t)(-1), though, so maybe we should just move that #ifdef out to some global place? -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
В списке pgsql-committers по дате отправления: