Re: Streaming replication and non-blocking I/O
От | Magnus Hagander |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Streaming replication and non-blocking I/O |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 9837222c1001151151s2eb0fae7p7b2b3826f9506f2c@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Streaming replication and non-blocking I/O (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Streaming replication and non-blocking I/O
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
2010/1/15 Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>: > > > Heikki Linnakangas wrote: >> >> Do people still use MinGW for any real work? Could we just drop >> walreceiver support from MinGW builds? >> >> Or maybe we should consider splitting walreceiver into two parts after >> all. Only the bare minimum that needs to access libpq would go into the >> shared object, and the rest would be linked with the backend as usual. >> >> > > I use MinGW when doing Windows work (e.g. the threading piece in parallel pg_restore). And I think it is generally desirableto be able to build on Windows using an open source tool chain. I'd want a damn good reason to abandon its use.And I don't like the idea of not supporting walreceiver on it either. Please find another solution if possible. > Yeah. FWIW, I don't use mingw do do any windows development, but definitely +1 on working hard to keep support for it if at all possible. -- Magnus HaganderMe: http://www.hagander.net/Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: