Re: 'replication' keyword on .pgpass (Streaming Replication)
| От | Magnus Hagander |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: 'replication' keyword on .pgpass (Streaming Replication) |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 9837222c1001070448w327108b4tee6920192b85018@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: 'replication' keyword on .pgpass (Streaming Replication) (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 10:21, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 5:46 PM, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote: >> However, wouldn't it make more logical sense to replace "host/hostssl" >> with "replication/replicationssl" rather than overload the database >> field? > > Seems good. How about the following formats? > > replication user CIDR-address auth-method [auth-options] > replicationssl user CIDR-address auth-method [auth-options] > replication user IP-address IP-mask auth-method [auth-options] > replicationssl user IP-address IP-mask auth-method [auth-options] > > Note that "database" field has been removed since it's useless > for replication. Hm, no, I think I withdraw my comment about pg_hba.conf. It seems better to overload the database name here. I'm not particularly keen on yet another different set of columns, which is what happens when you remove the database field. -- Magnus HaganderMe: http://www.hagander.net/Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: