Re: Build sizes vs docs

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Magnus Hagander
Тема Re: Build sizes vs docs
Дата
Msg-id 9837222c0912090903j69e6dd56lbb603ed0c1e29b9a@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Build sizes vs docs  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: Build sizes vs docs  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
2009/12/9 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>:
> Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes:
>> Perhaps we should just add it to the release checklist to verify that
>> they are reasonably correct?
>
> Go for it.  Now that you mention it, there are some memory-usage tables
> in the documentation about shared memory configuration that also have
> a pretty short half-life, and should be rechecked.

Done.

They're up-to-date per 8.3, btw. Are there changes in 8.4 that should
be put in? If so, it would be good to include it before the next minor
release, so the proper data goes up on the website.


-- Magnus HaganderMe: http://www.hagander.net/Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Build sizes vs docs
Следующее
От: Alvaro Herrera
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Build sizes vs docs