Re: Set statement timeout in the query tool
От | Magnus Hagander |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Set statement timeout in the query tool |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 9837222c0912040509k73420029p49b17f1ccb46ef50@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Set statement timeout in the query tool (Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: Set statement timeout in the query tool
|
Список | pgadmin-hackers |
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 10:52, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote: > On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 9:41 AM, Guillaume Lelarge > <guillaume@lelarge.info> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Someone, on a french PostgreSQL forum, ask me for a statement timeout UI in >> the query tool. Here is what I've done so far: >> >> * add a config in the Query tab of the Options window; >> * add a textbox in the toolbar of the query tool; > > We certainly don't need both. Definitely not. I'd go with just the textbox, if any. >> * each query executed will first get the old statement_timeout value, set >> statement_timeout to the text box one (which is initialized with the config >> value), execute the real query, and then get back to the old value > > Why save/reset it? The next query will just change it again anyway, > and there's no way round that. > >> I checked the UI on Windows, Mac OS X, and Linux. > > What's wrong with just setting it manually in the script anyway? There > are various parameters people might want to set, that we definitely > don't want to add UI for. I'll concede that statement_timeout is more > likely to be used than most others, but it seems to me that forcing it > to be set with every query is far less flexible than just setting it > as and when required in your script. I think the use-case is to have a default value for people who may otherwise send off a query that takes way too long? But in that case, it's probably better implemented as a default value on the server side, no? -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
В списке pgadmin-hackers по дате отправления: