Re: Is it correct to update db state in control file as "shutting down" during end-of-recovery checkpoint?

On 12/6/21, 4:34 AM, "Bharath Rupireddy" <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com> wrote:
> While the database is performing end-of-recovery checkpoint, the
> control file gets updated with db state as "shutting down" in
> CreateCheckPoint (see the code snippet at [1]) and at the end it sets
> it back to "shut down" for a brief moment and then finally to "in
> production". If the end-of-recovery checkpoint takes a lot of time or
> the db goes down during the end-of-recovery checkpoint for whatever
> reasons, the control file ends up having the wrong db state.
>
> Should we add a new db state something like
> DB_IN_END_OF_RECOVERY_CHECKPOINT/"in end-of-recovery checkpoint" or
> something else to represent the correct state?

This seems like a reasonable change to me.  From a quick glance, it
looks like it should be a simple fix that wouldn't add too much
divergence between the shutdown and end-of-recovery checkpoint code
paths.

Nathan