Re: tuple radix sort
| От | Chao Li | 
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: tuple radix sort | 
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 98232211-F000-45E6-AEE7-718834DDE277@gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст  | 
		
| Ответ на | Re: tuple radix sort (John Naylor <johncnaylorls@gmail.com>) | 
| Ответы | 
                	
            		Re: tuple radix sort
            		
            		 | 
		
| Список | pgsql-hackers | 
> On Oct 30, 2025, at 11:40, John Naylor <johncnaylorls@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 30, 2025 at 8:56 AM Chao Li <li.evan.chao@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I changed work_men to 1GB and reran the test. As the high cardinality data are still there, so I first reran with data: > >> With radix_sort on and off, execution time are almost the same. > > Are you by chance running with asserts on? It's happened before, so I > have to make sure. That makes a big difference here because I disabled > diversion thresholds in assert builds so that regression tests (few > cases with large inputs) cover the paths I want, in addition to my > running a standalone stress test. > Yes, assert is always enabled in my sandbox. I can disable assert and rerun the test later. Best regards, -- Chao Li (Evan) HighGo Software Co., Ltd. https://www.highgo.com/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: