Re: [HACKERS] Current sources?
От | dg@illustra.com (David Gould) |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Current sources? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 9806160820.AA10369@hawk.illustra.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Current sources? (Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> > >> PPC/Linux has been broken too. > > > > > >Please let me know what the problem was, even if it was just the 'global tas' > > >thing. I am trying to make sure this works on all platforms. Thanks. > > > > Here are patches for s_lock.c (against May23 snapshot). > > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > *** s_lock.c.orig Mon May 25 18:08:20 1998 > > --- s_lock.c Mon May 25 18:08:57 1998 > > *************** > > *** 151,161 **** > > > > #if defined(PPC) > > > > ! static int > > ! tas_dummy() > > { > > __asm__(" \n\ > > - tas: \n\ > > lwarx 5,0,3 \n\ > > cmpwi 5,0 \n\ > > bne fail \n\ > > --- 151,160 ---- > > > > #if defined(PPC) > > > > ! int > > ! tas(slock_t *lock) > > { > > __asm__(" \n\ > > lwarx 5,0,3 \n\ > > cmpwi 5,0 \n\ > > bne fail \n\ > > This patch appears to have been applied already. > > -- Yes. I picked up all the S_LOCK related patches and messages from the mailinglist and folded them into the big S_LOCK patch that just got commited. So, unless I have messed up, or someone comes up with something new, no other S_LOCK patches should be applied. Thanks -dg David Gould dg@illustra.com 510.628.3783 or 510.305.9468 Informix Software 300 Lakeside Drive Oakland, CA 94612 - A child of five could understand this! Fetch me a child of five.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: