Re: [HACKERS] Current sources?
От | dg@illustra.com (David Gould) |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Current sources? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 9805312207.AA27447@hawk.illustra.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Current sources? (The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Marc G. Fournier wrote: > > > On Sun, 31 May 1998, David Gould wrote: > > > > > > > Thanks. One question, is there any reason we can't use the intx tests on > > > > all the platforms? I realize that float it another set of problems, but it > > > > seems that int should be be the same? > > > > > > 10c10 > > > < ERROR: pg_atoi: error reading "100000": Result too large > > > --- > > > > ERROR: pg_atoi: error reading "100000": Math result not representable > > > > > > The changes are more error message relatd then anything... > > > > > Thats what I thought. So can we just rename the int*-*BSD.out to int*.out? > > No cause then that will break the Linux regression tests :) For the "int" tests? I hope not. Anyhow, I will test this and see if I can clean up some regression issues. I plan to break a lot of stuff in the next few weeks (ok, months) and sure want to be able to count on the regression suite to help me find my way. -dg
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: