Re: [HACKERS] Current sources?
От | dg@illustra.com (David Gould) |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Current sources? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 9805310800.AA26743@hawk.illustra.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Current sources? (The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Current sources?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
The Hermit Hacker wrote: > On Tue, 26 May 1998, Tom Lane wrote: > > Perhaps the real lesson to be learned is that a little more effort > > should be expended on the regression tests. I have a couple of > > suggestions: > > > > 1. As far as I've seen there is no documentation on how to create > > regression tests. This should be documented and made as easy as > > possible, to encourage people to create tests for missing cases. > > > > 2. System variations (roundoff error differences, etc) create spurious > > test complaints that make it hard to interpret the results properly. > > Can anything be done to clean this up? > > See the expected/int2-FreeBSD.out and similar files...I've done > what I can with the 'spurious test complaints... > Thanks. One question, is there any reason we can't use the intx tests on all the platforms? I realize that float it another set of problems, but it seems that int should be be the same? -dg David Gould dg@illustra.com 510.628.3783 or 510.305.9468 Informix Software 300 Lakeside Drive Oakland, CA 94612 - A child of five could understand this! Fetch me a child of five.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: