Re: [HACKERS] OK to send e-mail?
От | ocie@paracel.com |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] OK to send e-mail? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 9805061749.AA02691@dolomite.paracel.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] OK to send e-mail? (Michael Meskes <meskes@topsystem.de>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] OK to send e-mail?
Re: [HACKERS] OK to send e-mail? |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Michael Meskes wrote: > > ocie@paracel.com writes: > > Why don't we make it known (In the periodic developers FAQ posting?) > > that we do not accept unsolicited email and that we will charge a fee > > ($50 per line per subscriber :). I for one would be more than happy > > to do the detective work to track these down. As for what to do with > > the money -- perhaps we should see how much we get first. > > This won't work. We have a similar policy with the Debian project. But we > have yet to see money. No lawyer will help you there. And the spammers won't > send money because they like the policy. :-( No, but if we can figure out who did it and send them a bill for our services rendered (reading their spam), which they solicited by posting it (as per the conditions in our FAQ, then we can turn them over to a collection agency if they don't come through. Of course tracking down the poster is a trick in the first place. > > I think the best way is to install anti-spamming software. I think any such method can be circumvented. The only long-term solution is to make spamming unprofitable. One thing that would go a long way is to reverse-verify the sender's address. If the sender has forged this, the mail is dropped and we get the sound of one spam clapping :) The problem is that most sites nowadays won't verify email addresses. This sounds like a good project for a free relational database. Anybody know of any good ones out there? :) Ocie
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: