Developer setup, what works?
От | dg@illustra.com (David Gould) |
---|---|
Тема | Developer setup, what works? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 9804052044.AA17013@hawk.illustra.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Developer setup, what works?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
I am thinking about a project that may change a large number of source files. It may also take a fair amount of time, so I expect the main source tree to get changed a fair amount during my work. What is the best way of setting up my source tree to support mergeing my changes later later? Or maybe another way to ask is how do I make the best use of cvs and cvsup etc to support concurant development? Or even, what are the active pgsql developers doing now? Do you try to stay up to date on the patchs for you own source tree? Do you maintain a local cvs repository? If so, how do you handle branching and merging? Do you use "vendor branches"? I am sure I can puzzle something out, but if you have already developed ways of organizing this that are 'standard procedure' or that work especially well, I would like to take advantage of them. Thanks, -dg David Gould dg@illustra.com 510.628.3783 or 510.305.9468 Informix Software (No, really) 300 Lakeside Drive Oakland, CA 94612 - Linux. Not because it is free. Because it is better.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: