Re: [HACKERS] inherited sequences and primary keys
От | dg@illustra.com (David Gould) |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] inherited sequences and primary keys |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 9804030731.AA12288@hawk.illustra.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] inherited sequences and primary keys ("Maurice Gittens" <mgittens@gits.nl>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Maurice: > IMO the current semantics for inheritance in Postgresql are broken. It seems that way. > I've been wanting to do something about it but I got distracted and started > to debug some other problems in the system. > > I hope to get back to this some time. > > I personally feel that we have to make some choices: > > Is postgresql going to be an Object Relational dbms or is it going to > be yet another relation dbms? > > When the developers make an explicite choice on this point it will be a > Good Thing (tm). Agreed. There are lots of pretty decent relation dbms's out there. There are very few Object Relational dbms's. I happen to think ORDBMS is a really cool idea and have seen some great applications done with it that a straight up RDBMS just couldn't do. So my vote is for ORDBMS. That said, postgresql needs to become a much better RDBMS that it currently is. -dg David Gould dg@illustra.com 510.628.3783 or 510.305.9468 Informix Software (No, really) 300 Lakeside Drive Oakland, CA 94612 - Linux. Not because it is free. Because it is better.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: