Re: refactoring basebackup.c
От | tushar |
---|---|
Тема | Re: refactoring basebackup.c |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 97b377c3-15b9-517f-1fca-8b4150978e91@enterprisedb.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: refactoring basebackup.c (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: refactoring basebackup.c
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 1/27/22 10:17 PM, Robert Haas wrote: > Cool. I committed that patch. Thanks , Please refer to this scenario where the label is set to 0 for server-gzip but the directory is still compressed [edb@centos7tushar bin]$ ./pg_basebackup -t server:/tmp/11 --gzip --compress=0 -Xnone NOTICE: all required WAL segments have been archived [edb@centos7tushar bin]$ ls /tmp/11 16384.tar backup_manifest base.tar [edb@centos7tushar bin]$ ./pg_basebackup -t server:/tmp/10 --gzip --compress=server-gzip:0 -Xnone NOTICE: all required WAL segments have been archived [edb@centos7tushar bin]$ ls /tmp/10 16384.tar.gz backup_manifest base.tar.gz 0 is for no compression so the directory should not be compressed if we mention server-gzip:0 and both these above scenarios should match? -- regards,tushar EnterpriseDB https://www.enterprisedb.com/ The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: