Re: Best use of second controller with faster disks?
От | Vivek Khera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Best use of second controller with faster disks? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 97E42E3F-2F4C-4518-B378-870A4168664B@khera.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Best use of second controller with faster disks? (Francisco Reyes <lists@stringsutils.com>) |
Список | pgsql-performance |
On Jun 12, 2007, at 8:33 PM, Francisco Reyes wrote: > Vivek Khera writes: > >> what raid card have you got? > > 2 3ware cards. > I believe both are 9550SX >> i'm playing with an external enclosure which has an areca sata >> raid in it and connects to the host via fibre channel. > > What is the OS? FreeBSD? FreeBSD, indeed. The vendor, Partners Data Systems, did a wonderful job ensuring that everything integrated well to the point of talking with various FreeBSD developers, LSI engineers, etc., and sent me a fully tested system end-to-end with a Sun X4100 M2, LSI 4Gb Fibre card, and their RAID array, with FreeBSD installed already. I can't recommend them enough -- if you need a high-end RAID system for FreeBSD (or other OS, I suppose) do check them out. >> Right now I'm testing an 8-disk RAID6 configuration on the same >> device; it seems slower than the 16-disk RAID6, but I haven't yet >> tried 8-disk RAID10 with dedicated log yet. > > Is all this within the same controller? Yes, the system is in testing right now, so I'm playing with all sort of different disk configurations and it seems that the 16-disk RAID6 is the winner so far. The next best was the 14-disk RAID6 + 2 disk RAID1 for log. I have separate disks built-in to the system for boot.
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: