Re: [HACKERS] Get stuck when dropping a subscription duringsynchronizing table
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Get stuck when dropping a subscription duringsynchronizing table |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 979d1f55-16af-7879-685b-efd0ff1384d8@2ndquadrant.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Get stuck when dropping a subscription duringsynchronizing table (Petr Jelinek <petr.jelinek@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Get stuck when dropping a subscription duringsynchronizing table
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 5/24/17 15:14, Petr Jelinek wrote: > All the locking works just fine the way it is in master. The issue with > deadlock with apply comes from the wrong handling of the SIGTERM in the > apply (we didn't set InterruptPending). I changed the SIGTERM handler in > patch 0001 just to die which is actually the correct behavior for apply > workers. I also moved the connection cleanup code to the > before_shmem_exit callback (similar to walreceiver) and now that part > works correctly. I have committed this, in two separate parts. This should fix the originally reported issue. I will continue to work through your other patches. I notice there is still a bit of discussion about another patch, so please let me know if there is anything else I should be looking for. -- Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: