Re: Minimum supported version of Python?
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Minimum supported version of Python? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 9788.1395023687@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Minimum supported version of Python? (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Minimum supported version of Python?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes: > On Sat, 2014-03-15 at 20:55 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >> Our documentation claims that the minimum Python version for plpython >> is 2.3. However, an attempt to build with that on an old Mac yielded >> a bunch of failures in the plpython_types regression test, >> Personally I have no desire to put any effort into fixing this, and >> thus suggest that we just change the documentation to specify that 2.5 >> is the minimum Python version since 9.0. Does anybody else want to >> work harder on it, and if so what would you propose doing exactly? > It is debatable whether 2.3 should still be considered supported in 9.4. > If we do drop it, then the supported version should be 2.4. Personally, > I think everything is fine as it is. Well, if you want to consider python 2.3 as supported, I have a buildfarm machine I am about to put online that has 2.3 on it. If I spin it up with python enabled, I expect you to see to it that it starts passing. If you won't do that, I'm going to change the documentation. As for 2.4 vs 2.5, I don't have a lot of faith that we're really supporting anything that's not represented in the buildfarm... regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: